Back
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Muthulakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court observations on the investigations and treatment. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. analysis of the treatment and police negligence. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 5. legal principles regarding medical negligence and the necessity of compensation. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 6. court’s decision on compensation claims. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 7. justification of compensation amounts and court orders. (Para 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78) |
| 8. final conclusions and orders issued by the court. (Para 79 , 80 , 81) |
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer in W.P.No.32765 of 2014: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay an exemplary compensation of Rs.25,00,000/- to the petitioner, her three children and the aged father-in-law and mother-in-law, who all have b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
