JUDGMENT :

R. THARANI, J.

Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, to set aside the award and decree made in M.C.O.P. No. 365 of 2014 dated 13.02.2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special District Court, Madurai.

1. This appeal is filed against the order made in M.C.O.P. No. 365 of 2014 dated 13.02.2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special District Court, Madurai. The appellant herein is the second respondent in the claim petition. The first and second respondents are the claimants. The third respondent is the first respondent in the claim petition.

2. Brief substance of the petition filed by the claimant is as follows: On 02.02.2014, when the deceased was travelling in a two wheeler bearing registration number TN 59 AH 6724, as a pillion rider along with a one year old child, along the Tirumangalam to Madurai road, a Government bus driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, came from the opposite direction, over taking an auto, thereby came to the right side of the road, dashed against the two wheeler and the deceased died at that spot. The deceased was doing embroidery work and was earning Rs. 8,000/- at the time of accident. The claimants are the dependents of the deceased and they claimed Rs. 10 Lakhs as compensation.

3. Brief substance of the counter filed by the second respondent is as follows:

The accident happened only due to the negligence of the rider of the two wheeler. The bus driver is not responsible for the accident. The age, profession and income of the deceased are all denied. Two witnesses were examined and eleven documents were marked on the side of the petitioner. One witness was examined on the side of the respondent. No document was marked on the side of the respondent. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 9,89,000/- as compensation.

4. Against the award, the appellant preferred this appeal on the following grounds:

The Tribunal has erred in deciding that the driver of the appellant was solely responsible for the accident. The entire negligence is on the rider of the two wheeler. It was the first respondent who drove the two wheeler in a rash and negligent manner along with the deceased as a pillion rider carrying a child and he lost his balance and hence the deceased person fell on the road and sustained injuries. The award amount is excessive. The claim was Rs. 10 Lakhs. There is no proof for the monthly income of the deceased. The Tirbunal awarded Rs. 8,64,000/- towards loss of income and awarded Rs. 50,000/- towards loss of love and affair, Rs. 50,000/- towards loss of consortium, Rs. 25,000/- towards funeral expenses, which are all excessive.

5. On the side of the appellant, it is stated that the claimants are the husband and the daughter of the deceased. The husband drove the two wheeler. The deceased was the pillion rider. Due to a pit in the road, the first respondent lost the balance of the vehicle and hence the pillion rider fell down. The monthly income fixed by the Tribunal is excessive.

6. On the side of the respondents it is stated that when the bus tried to over taken an auto, the bus came to the right side of the road and hit against the two wheeler. Only notional income was fixed by the Tribunal. The deceased was aged about 24 years and the multiplier applied by the Tribunal is reasonable. The 1½ years old child was left motherless and pray the award to be confirmed.

7. The accident took place in the year 2014. A copy of the First Information Report was marked as Ex.P1. Copies of the Motor Vehicle Inspection reports were marked as Ex.P4 and P5. Rough sketch was marked as Ex.P6. Copy of the charge sheet was marked as Ex.P7. On the basis of the evidence of P.W.1 and 2 and based on Ex.P1 to Ex.P4, the trial Court has fixed the liability on the bus driver. A perusal of the records reveals that