IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Selvi Tamilarasi Jacob – Petitioner
Versus
The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai and Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 8748 of 2014, M.P. No. 1 of 2014
Decided On : 06-07-2022
Pension Benefits - Secondary Grade Teacher - The petitioner sought pension benefits for her service as a Secondary Grade Teacher in a school, but the court held that she was not entitled to pension benefits as she had abandoned her service and did not fulfill the conditions for pension under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Secondary Grade Teacher, sought pension benefits for her service in a school from 1980 to 1994. She had abandoned her service and later filed a writ petition seeking pension benefits.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was not entitled to pension benefits as she had abandoned her service, did not fulfill the conditions for pension, and had filed the writ petition after a lapse of about 20 years from the date of abandoning the service.
Issues: Entitlement to pension benefits, abandonment of service, fulfillment of pension conditions, and delay in filing the writ petition.
Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner did not fulfill the conditions for pension under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, had abandoned her service, and filed the writ petition after a significant delay.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner was not entitled to pension benefits and that she had filed the petition after a significant delay.
JUDGMENT :
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to grant pension benefits to the petitioner for the service rendered by her as Secondary Grade Teacher in the 4th respondent School from 1.7.1980 to 31.10.1994 together with interest at 18% per annum for the belated payment.
1. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to grant pension benefits to the petitioner for the service rendered by her as Secondary Grade Teacher in the 4th respondent School from 1.7.1980 to 31.10.1994 together with interest at 18% per annum for the belated payment.
2. The petitioner states that she was working as Secondary Grade Teacher in the aided Schools under the Management of 4th respondent from 01.07.1980 to 31.10.1994. The petitioner worked subsequently in various other Schools on 01.11.1994, the petitioner was transferred to another School namely RC School in Kosuvampatty running under the 4th respondent/Management. The petitioner could not able to join duty due to medical reasons and she was hospitalized. When the petitioner approached the 4th respondent / Management after two months, she was informed that somebody was appointed in her place. The petitioner states that she has served about 14 years in the 4th respondent School and the said services are to be taken into consideration as qualifying service for the purpose of pensionary benefits. The petitioner states that she has submitted a representation in this regard and the said representation was not considered. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition.
3. The respondents states that the petitioner served as Secondary Grade Teacher in the Aided Schools under the Management of the 4th respondent from 01.07.1980 to 31.10.1994 i.e., for about nearly 14 years 2 months and 27 days. The petitioner submitted an application for grant of pension for the services rendered by her in the 4th respondent School.
4. The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu/third respondent has stated that the petitioner has admittedly stayed away from duty and she has not relieved from service by the competent authority in any one of the modes prescribed in Chapter V of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, that would fetch pensionary benefits.
5. The learned counsel for the third respondent relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Sri. C. Jacob vs. Director of Geology and Mining and Another, 2008 (10) SCC 115 and paragraph 12 of the judgment is relevant, which reads as follows:
6. In view of the above judgment, the petitioner is not entitled for the pensionary benefits.
7. Having quit the services on 31.10.1994, the petitioner has preferred the writ petition in the year 2014, after a lapse of 20 years from the date of abandoning the job. Thus, the writ petition is liable to be rejected on the ground of laches also. The provisions of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules 1978, governing the grant of pensionary benefits are as under:
(a) The entitlement of pension is governed by Chapter V of the said Rules, which enumerated the classes of pension and conditions for entitlement. The enumerated classes of pension are:
(i) Superannuation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.