SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 633

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.A. Nakkiran, J.
M. Sadagopan – Plaintiff
Versus
M. Narashiman & Another – Defendants
TOS. No. 46 of 2006 & Tr. CS. No. 118 of 2008
Decided On : 08-07-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Plaintiff :T.N. Rajagopalan, Advocate.
For the Defendant :Shyamala, Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of proving the authenticity and validity of a Will, and the significance of a party's actions and acknowledgments in determining their entitlement to claim partition and share in properties.

Headnote:

Indian Succession Act - Testamentary Original Suit - Sections 232, 276 - Order 25 Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules - grant Letters of Administration, partition by metes and bounds, separate possession, mesne profits - [KEYWORD] - Testamentary Original Suit - 232, 276, Order 25 Rule 5

Fact of the Case:

The Testamentary Original Suit was filed to grant Letters of Administration and seek partition of properties. The Plaintiff claimed entitlement to the properties under a Will, while the Defendant contested the authenticity of the Will and the Plaintiff's entitlement to the properties. The Plaintiff also filed a suit seeking partition and possession of his share in the properties.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the Will dated 21.10.1977 was proved to be genuine and valid, and the Plaintiff was entitled to Letters of Administration. In the partition suit, the Court held that the Plaintiff was not entitled to claim partition as he had been separated from the family and had acknowledged receipt of a settlement amount, thereby dismissing the suit.

Issues: The issues revolved around the authenticity of the Will, the Plaintiff's entitlement to the properties, the claim for partition, and the payment of mesne profits.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on the evidence presented, including the testimony of witnesses and the contents of the Will, to determine the authenticity and validity of the Will. The Court also considered the Plaintiff's actions and acknowledgments to decide on his entitlement to claim partition and share in the properties.

Final Decision: The Testamentary Original Suit was allowed, granting Letters of Administration to the Plaintiff. The partition suit was dismissed, denying the Plaintiff's claim for partition and possession of his share in the properties.

JUDGMENT :

(Prayer: This Testamentary Original Suit has been filed, under Sections 232 & 276 of the Indian Succession Act and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules, for the reliefs as stated therein. This Tr.CS has been filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC, for the reliefs, as stated therein.)

1. This Testamentary Original Suit has been filed to grant Letters of Administration, with a copy of the Will annexed, to the Plaintiff, as the son and legatee under the Will of the deceased, having effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.

2. This Tr.CS has been filed, seeking a judgement and decree, directing partition by metes and bounds and separate possession of the Plaintiff's 1/2nd share in the Plaint A, B and C Schedule properties and to allot one such 1/2nd share to the Plaintiff and directing the Defendants to pay future mesne profits to the Plaintiff from the date of the plaint till 26.09.2006 viz. the death of the 2nd Defendant for 1/3rd share of the suit property and thereafter, direct the 2nd Defendant to pay mesne profits till the Plaintiff gets possession of his 1/2nd share of the suit properties.

3. The case of the Plaintiff in TOS, in a nutshell, as set out, in the plaint is that the Plaintiff and the Defendant are brothers and their father D.Madavan Pillai, was ordinarily residing at No.9A, Ishwar Doss Lala Street, Triplicane, Chennai, until his death on 06.01.1978 at the said residence and his wife and parents predeceased him. The deceased father had also two daughters, namely, Lakshmi Kantham and Komala and he got properties under a Will, dated 20.8.1958 and the said Will was probated on 3.12.1965. He executed a Will, dated 21.10.1977, while he was in a sound and disposing state of mind and in the presence of the witnesses, bequeathing the properties to the Plaintiff and Komala, who died on 05.05.1994, as a spinster. In and by the said Will, Lakshmi Kantham was given the entire ground floor of the house at Door No.9A, Ishwar Doss Lala Street, Triplicane, Chennai-5 and Komala was given Door No.10, Nagojee Rao Street, Triplicane, Chennai-5 and the Plaintiff was given the entire first floor of the house at Door No.9A, Ishwar Doss Lala Street, Triplicane, Chennai-5. The Defendant was leading a wasteful life and he was separated from the family on 03.01.1971 and he had accepted Rs.10,000/- in cash on 10.07.1976 in full quit and discharge of all his claims. The suit in OS.No.1952 of 2005 was filed by the Defendant for partition. Komala died on 5.5.1994 as a spinster leaving all her assets to the Plaintiff. The whereabouts of the attesting witnesses D.Perumal and P.Krishnaswamy Chetty are not known. But, another attesting witness Arugadoss has affirmed the execution of the Will. Hence, the Plaintiff is alone entitled to the properties bequeathed under the Will. The Testator has not made any appointment of executor of the said Will. The amount of assets, which is likely to come into the hands of the Plaintiff does not exceed in the aggregate the sum of Rs.10,00,000/-- and the net amount of the said assets, after deducing all the items, which the Plaintiff, is by law allowed to deduct, is only of the value of Rs.9,90,000/-. The Plaintiff has impleaded the only next of kin or other persons interested as the Defendant. There is no next of kin or other persons interested to be impleaded. Since the original Will was misplaced, a copy of the same has been filed. The Plaintiff undertakes to duly administer the property and the credits of the said Testator, in any way concerning his Will, by paying first his debts and then, the legacies therein bequeathed so far as the assets will extend and to make a full and true inventory thereof and exhibit the same in the Court, within six months from the date of grant of Letters of Administration, with the Will annexed to the Plaintiff and also render a true account of the said property and credits within one year from the said date. No application has been made to any District Court or deleg

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top