IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
L. Baskaran – Appellant
Versus
The Superintending Engineer, Cuddalore Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Cuddalore & Others – Respondents
W.P. No. 33706 of 2014
Decided on : 19-07-2022
Lok Adalat - Pension Disbursement - Dispute Resolution
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a retired employee, participated in a Lok Adalat and consented to give his commuted portion of the pension to his daughter. Subsequently, he sought to settle the benefits in his favor due to family disputes.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the family disputes between the petitioner and his daughter cannot be adjudicated in a writ proceeding. The court upheld the decision of the competent authorities to implement the Lok Adalat award and dismissed the writ petition.
Issues: Dispute over pension disbursement and family disputes
Ratio Decidendi: The court cannot adjudicate family disputes in a writ proceeding. The decision of the competent authorities to implement the Lok Adalat award prevails.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition stands dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent, relating to the impugned order dated 06.12.2014, bearing Ref.No. Admn.Ku.Or.No.1192-3/SE/CEDC/Cud/Admn3/U2/Ko.KAT/2014, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 to disburse the pension and arrears of pension with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of his superannuation i.e. from 31.01.2010.)
1. The information provided by the Superintending Engineer in proceedings dated 06.12.2014 is sought to be quashed in the present writ petition.
2. The writ petitioner states that he was working as a Foreman in the TANGEDCO and he was allowed to retire from service on 31.01.2010. The petitioner states that he participated in the Lok Adalat proceedings and consented to give his commuted portion of the pension to the third respondent, who is none other than his daughter. The Award of the Lok Adalat passed on 24.03.2010 reads as under:-
i) It seems, barring commuted pension all other retiral benefits have been already disbursed to the third respondent as reported by the respondents 1 and 2. Therefore, it is agreed by all the parties that the commuted pension shall be deposited in the name of the unmarried daughter of the petitioner and the third respondent by name Elakiya Rani who is doing her 1st B.Sc., Nursing. Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to deposit the same.
ii) It is informed by parties concerned that the third respondent, has so far not given any option to receive family pension. It is agreed by the parties that since the petitioner is the lawfully wedded wife of the third respondent, the third respondent hereby states that the petitioner may be nominated to receive family pension. Accordingly, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to enter the name of the petitioner as wife and nominee for receiving family pension in the official records.
iii) The petitioner and the third respondent agree to live together and resume co-habitation from now onwards.
3. In view of the settlement between the parties, it is agreed by both sides that M.C.No.2 of 2009 pending before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ulundurpet shall stand disposed of withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh application for maintenance in case any misunderstanding arises between the parties in future and the third respondent fails to maintain his wife.
4. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ulundurpet is directed to dispose of M.C.No.2 of 2009 as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition if exigency arise."
3. The petitioner had settled the commuted portion of his terminal benefits in view of the Award passed in the Lok Adalat and accordingly, the third respondent/daughter was the beneficiary.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the third respondent is now not taking care of the petitioner and his wife. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation to the respondent authority to settle the benefits in his favour. The authorities have declined his request on the ground that the commuted pension awarded was settled through Lok Adalat and they cannot overturn the same.
5. This Court is of the considered opinion that there are several disputes between the family members and the petitioner himself has admitted the same in paragraph 5 of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, which reads as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.