Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
M. Pandurangan – Appellant
Versus
B. Chandramohan – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondent for having committed the contempt of court for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order dated 03.04.2019 made in W.P. No. 10976 of 2018.
The Contempt petition is filed to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order dated 03.04.2019, passed in W.P. No. 10976 of 2018. This Court has passed an order as follows :
7. Accordingly, the writ petition stand disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
The High Court emphasized that contempt applications must be filed within one year of the alleged contempt, adhering to statutory limitations while asserting selective exercise of inherent powers onl....
The limitation prescribed under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act cannot go against the constitutional mandate contained in Article 215 of the Constitution. The court emphasized that the mere ....
Any contempt proceedings initiated must comply with the one-year limitation period stipulated under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, barring exceptional circumstances.
Contempt of court conviction requires proof beyond reasonable doubt; courts have inherent power to ensure justice, unaffected by procedural timelines in cases of fraud.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed that contempt proceedings are subject to strict limitation periods, and the concept of a continuing wrong does not apply to single acts of non-compliance with court order....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article