R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR
Nandhini – Appellant
Versus
Poovarasan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act (66 of 1984) against the Ex.order and fair order dated 06.06.2015 made in H.M.O.P.No.323 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul.)
R. Subramanian & N. Sathish Kumar, J.
1. The wife who suffered a decree for divorce in HMOP.No. 323 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Dindigul, is on appeal.
2. The marriage took place on 24.01.2011 at Dindigul. Claiming that the wife left the matrimonial home even as early as on 03.02.2011 and did not return despite repeated requests by the husband and that she had committed acts of mental cruelty, by ignoring him and his parents and sharing their private life with her sisters, the husband sought for divorce. He originally filed an original petition before the Sub Court, Namakkal, in HMOP.No.51 of 2013. Pending the above petition, the wife launched the proceedings in HMOP.No.94 of 2013 on the file of the Sub Court, Dindigul, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking restitution of conjugal rights. It appears that both the petitions were transferred to the Family Court, Dindigul, and re-numbered as HMOP.No.117 of 2014 (HMOP.No.94 of 2013) filed by the wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.