SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1344

N. ANAND VENKATESH
Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Asupathy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Srinath Sridevan, Advocate. For the Respondent:A. Muthukumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed Under Section 100 r/w Order 42, Rule 1 of C.P.C., as against the decree and judgment dated 27.08.2014 made in A.S.No.15 of 2013 on the file of Subordinate Court, Chidambaram, reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2012 made in O.S.No.41 of 2006 on the file of District Munsif Court at Kattumannarkoil.)

1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal.

2. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property was a part of a larger extent of property measuring about 6 cents. The further case of the plaintiff is that there was a oral partition between him and the defendant who is his brother in the year 1990 and the plaintiff constructed a house in the year 1995 under the Group House Scheme of the Government. It is stated that the defendant was staying abroad and he came back in the year 2004. He also got married on 09.04.2004. The plaintiff further states that the defendant requested the plaintiff to permit him to stay in the construction put up by the plaintiff for a period of three months till he constructs his house in the vacant land that was allotted in his favour in the oral partition. The plaintiff allowed the defendant to reside i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top