Back
P. T. ASHA
T. Senthilvelan – Appellant
Versus
A. Senthil Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section 75 (2) of Provincial Insolvency Act, read with Section 100 of the CPC against the Judgment and Decree passed in C.M.A.No.26 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Salem dated 31.08.2018 reversing the Fair and Final Order dated 11.11.2013 passed in I.P.No.37 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem.)
1. The point in issue in this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is whether the creditor can directly approach the Insolvency Court to have the borrower adjudged an Insolvent without obtaining a decree. This issue has to be answered in order to consider the substantial question of law that has been framed in this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal, namely,
When it is proved that the first respondent/debtor had admittedly borrowed money from the petitioner by executing a pronote as security for the borrowal and subsequently transferred his only property in favour of his wife without consideration and without making provision for his debts, is not the act of the respondent would amount to an act of insolvency?
2. The parties are referred to in the same ranking as before the Insol
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a valid debtor-creditor relationship and the need to prove the act of insolvency before adjudication under the Provincial In....
The burden of proving the contrary in insolvency proceedings is on the debtor, and the legal provisions create a presumption that the debtor has committed an act of insolvency if he fails to comply w....
The first appellate Court should follow proper procedures for additional evidence or remit the matter back to the trial Court for fresh consideration, and the appeal was maintainable under Section 75....
Insolvency law requires the burden of proof for insolvency claims to rest with creditors, and purchasers must demonstrate bona fide acquisition under the Provincial Insolvency Act.
The Judgment Debtor's failure to comply with the Insolvency Notice and subsequent Notice of Motion led to the adjudication of insolvency under Section 9(2) of the Insolvency Act.
The Insolvency Court lacks jurisdiction to annul transactions if the debtor has not been legally adjudicated as insolvent, rendering such annulments void.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
