R. HEMALATHA
Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Subramani – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in S.A.No.421 of 2006: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 18.03.2005 passed in A.S.No.50 of 2001, on the file of the I Additional District Court, Erode, reversing the decree and judgment dated 18.08.1998 passed in O.S.No.680 of 1981, on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Erode.
S.A.No.422 of 2006: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 18.03.2005 passed in A.S.No.51 of 2001, on the file of the I Additional District Court, Erode, upholding the decree and judgment dated 18.08.1998 passed in O.S.No.680 of 1981, on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Erode.)
Common Judgment
1. The appellant in both the appeals is the plaintiff in O.S.No.680/1981 on the file of I Additional District Munsif Court, Erode. She filed the suit for partition and separate possession of the suit properties.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking in the trial court and at appropriate places, their rank in the present appeals would also be indicated.
3. The minimum facts that are required for the disposal of the present second appea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.