C. SARAVANAN
Progressive Stone Works, Represented by its Proprietrix Aurosathyakala, Thindivanam – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner (ST), Vellore – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the files of the 3rd respondent in 33BAMPK4409C1Z2/2017- 2018, 2018-2019 dated 10.07.2020 and quash the same.)
Common Order:
1. The petitioner has challenged the respective Assessment Orders in these writ petitions for the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19. There is difference in the ITC claimed by the petitioner in its GSTR-2B and the information captured in the GSTR-2A as compared to the GSTR 1 of the supplier for the respective Assessment years. The demand has been workout as Rs.8,21,123/- and Rs.3,53,519/- for the Assessment Year 2017-18 and Assessment Year 2018-19 respectively.
2. On behalf of the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs had issued a clarification on 04.09.2018 bearing Circular No.125/44/2019- GST, wherein paragraph No.2.3 clarified as follows:
“ 2.3. In view of the difficulties being faced by the claimants of refund, it has been decided that the refund claim shall be accompanied by a print-out of Form GSTR-2A of the claimant for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.