MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, N. MALA
SRS Mining Represented by its Partner, K. Rethinam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Government of India, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to assessment orders based on search. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 29) |
| 2. constitutional validity of tax provisions. (Para 2 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. use of same evidence against multiple parties. (Para 14 , 60 , 88 , 91) |
| 4. violation of cross-examination rights. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 5. competence of authority issuing search warrants. (Para 70 , 72 , 79) |
| 6. remand for fresh assessment required. (Para 71 , 76 , 82) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration (i) to declare the impugned insertion / provisions of Section 292CC by the Finance Act 2012 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair and violative of various Articles of Constitution, particularly Articles 14 19 and 21, void, invalid in law, unconstitutional; (ii) to declare the impugned insertion/Explanation of the Finance Act 2017 in Section 132 (1) of the INCOME TAX ACT 1961 with retrospective effect from 1st April 1962, further inserted an Explanation under Section 132 (1A) of the Act with retrospective effect from 01.10.1975 and further inserted an Explanation in Section 132 A of the Act with retrospectiv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.