R. N. MANJULA
K. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
S. Anbunathan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: These Appeals have been filed under Section 96 and Order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2018 made in O.S.Nos.11665 & 11174 of 2010, on the file of the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.)
Common Judgment
1. These Appeal Suits have been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2018 made in O.S.Nos.11665 & 11174 of 2010, on the file of the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record.
3. Despite there are three suit properties, the dispute revolves around the first item of the Schedule mentioned properties.
4. The appellant is the first defendant in both the suits. The plaintiff S.Anbunathan in O.S.No.11665 of 2010 and the plaintiff Kalavathi in O.S.No.11174 of 2010 are the brother and sister of the first defendant. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred with their names.
5. The short facts of the case are as follows:
The parents of both the plaintiffs and the first defendant were natives of Pondicherry; after some time, the parents came down to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.