Back
M. SUNDAR
Green Malabar Finance Ventures Limited, Rep by its Authorised Signatory, R. Ramesh, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
K. Prajesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Arbitration Original Petition filed under Section 11(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, as amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 praying to (a) allow this petition and appoint a sole Arbitrator under clause 16 xv of the Loan Agreement dated 09.04.2021 of the Loan Agreement to adjudicate the dispute between the parties; (b) award the cost of present proceedings; and (c) pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.)
1. This order will now dispose of the captioned Arb.OP.
2. This order has to be read in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on 02.08.2022, which reads as follows :
'Captioned 'Arbitration Original Petition' [hereinafter 'Arb OP' for the sake of convenience and clarity] has been presented in this Court on 13.07.2022 under Section 11 of 'The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No.26 of 1996)' [hereinafter referred to as 'A and C Act' for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity] with a prayer for appointment of sole Arbitrator.
2. Mr.A.G.Sathyanarayana, learned counsel for sole petiti
The Court's decision was influenced by the narrow interpretation of Section 11(6A) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as discussed in the Mayavati Trading case law and Duro Felguera princ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the narrow scope of examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11(6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the statutory perimeter under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, confines the examination of the existence of an ar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the narrow scope of examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and th....
The main legal point established is the court's adherence to the narrow examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11(6A) and the emphasis on expeditious disposal of Secti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator based on the existence of an arbitration agreement, in accordance with the statutory provisions ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of a legal drill under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the expeditious disposal of petitions under ....
The Court's decision was guided by the narrow interpretation of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the legislative policy to minimize court intervention in appointing ar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the conclusive decision on the limitation plea and the importance of expeditious disposal of arbitration matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
