SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3235

P. T. ASHA
Ayeesha Sajana – Appellant
Versus
K. K. Aravindaraj – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:M/S. P. Yuaraj, Advocate. For the Respondents:R3, J. Chandran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as amended by Act 54 of 1994 to set aside the order and decreetal order made in M.C.O.P.No.2010 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Cum  Essential Commodities Act, Salem dated 28.02.2017 and for enhancement of compensation.)

1. The claimants filed the above appeals seeking for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Cum Additional District and Special Court for Essential Commodities Act, Salem, in M.C.O.P.No.2010 of 2014.

2. The appellants had filed the above claim petition seeking compensation for the death of one Shaeik Magasook Rahman, the husband of the first appellant and father of the second appellant and the son of appellants 3 and 4. The claimants have sought a compensation for a sum of Rs.97,00,000/-.

3. It is their case that the deceased was aged about 28 years at the time of his death and he was B.E. (Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering), Computer Engineer employed with M/s.Nour India Engineers Private India Limited on a monthly salary of Rs.30,000/-. On 01.11.2014, he was travelling along with his friends in two
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top