P. T. ASHA
T. Subramani – Appellant
Versus
N. V. Karuppaiya – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgement and Decree dated 01.04.2021 passed in A.S.No.18 of 2018 on the file of the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 01.02.2018 passed in O.S.No.416 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Namakkal.)
1. The unsuccessful plaintiff who has lost before the Courts below in a suit for specific performance has filed the above appeal, the same has been admitted on the following substantial questions of law:
''1) Whether the Lower Courts right in holding that the plaintiff failed to prove the due execution of the suit Agreement Ex.A1, especially, when the defendant categorically admitted his signature found in Ex.A1?
2) Whether or not the plaintiff proved the execution of Ex.A1 by examining the attestor of the document as PW2, who has spoken eloquently about the execution of the suit Sale Agreement Ex.A1?
3) Whether the Lower Courts right in holding that the plaintiff has not proved his readiness and willingness to perform his part of Contract, especially when he has paid almost the entire sale consideration and he issued the legal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.