SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 3345

D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Thangaraj – Appellant
Versus
Sarasu – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:J. Prithivi, Advocate. For the Respondents:P. Jagadeesan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree of the Learned I-Additional District Judge, Salem in O.S.No.151 of 2011, dated 19.12.2014.)

1. The Appeal Suit is directed against the Judgment and decree dated 19.12.2014 in O.S. No.151 of 2011, on the file of the I-Additional Court, Salem, in and by which the suit was filed by the respondents herein, for partition of the suit property and to allot 2/10 share each to the plaintiffs was decreed by the Trial Court.

2. The case of the plaintiffs is that the first plaintiff/Sarasu, the second plaintiff/ Neela, late Subramani represented by his legal heirs the third and fourth plaintiffs, and the first defendant/Thangaraj, second defendant Periamma and along with other one more person namely Ammasi (since deceased as a bachelor), were the children of Periyanna Nadar and Pappathi Ammal. The suit property was purchased by Pappathi Ammal, by a registered Sale Deed dated 07.12.1967. The said Periyanna Nadar died and thereafter, Pappathi Ammal passed away on 03.06.1968. The suit property was in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs and the defendants 1 & 2. In the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top