S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
R. Asokan – Appellant
Versus
A. Latha – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Presiding Officer, I Additional Family Court, Chennai to dispose off and pass order in O.P.No.1423 of 2016.
The Civil Revision Petition is filed for speedy disposal of the O.P.No.1423 of 2016.
2. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised on 04.12.1994 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. Due to misunderstanding, the petitioner and the respondent are living separately. The petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.1423 of 2016 for Divorce on the file of the I Additional Family Court at Chennai.
3. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that the respondent is trying to prolong the case for adverse benefit. Hence, the H.M.O.P filed by the petitioner is kept pending and the respondent / wife seeking longer adjournment after adjournment to prolong and protract the matter. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present Civil Revision Petition.
4. Unnecessary adjournments on flimsy grounds would cause prejudice to the parties to the litigation. Rule is to conduct the case on the date it is posted for hearing. Adjournment is an exception. Thus, adjournments are t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.