S. SOUNTHAR
Venkatesh Coke and Power Limited – Appellant
Versus
Otto India Private Limited – Respondent
ORDER :
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, pleased to set aside the Fair Order and Decreetal Order in E.A.No.15 of 2022 in E.A.No.6 of 2021 in E.P.No.128 of 2017 in Calcutta High Court C.S.No.196 of 2005 dated 11.08.2022 on the file of the 1st Additional District Judge at Thiruvallur and to dismiss the said application with costs throughout.
Aggrieved by an order allowing a petition to lead oral evidence and mark documentary evidence in a review application, the petitioner has come up by way of this revision.
2. The 1st respondent herein is a transferee decree holder in C.S.No.196 of 2005 on the file of the High Court of Calcutta. The 1st respondent herein filed Execution Petition against the revision petitioners and other respondents in E.P.No.128 of 2017. In the said Execution Petition an exparte order was passed against the revision petitioners on 22.10.2008, thereafter the revision petitioners filed an application to set aside the exparte order in E.A.No.48 of 2017. The said E.A.No.48 of 2017 was allowed by the Executing Court by order dated 18.11.2020. Aggrieved by the said order, the 1st respondent herein filed a review petition in
Bhagat Ram V. Khetu Ram and Anr. [AIR 1929 PC 110]
Padman and Others vs. Hanwanta and Others [AIR 1915 PC 111]
P.C.Purushothama Reddiar vs. S.Perumal [1972 (2) SCR 646]
R.VE.Venkatachala Gounder Vs. Arulmigu Viswesaraswami and V.P.Temple and another
The Roman Catholic Mission Vs. The State of Madras & Anr. AIR 1966 SC 1457
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.