IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. SIVAGNANAM, J.
Balakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Tiruvallur – Respondent
Crl.R.C. No. 484 of 2023
Decided On : 15-03-2023
Statutory Bail - NDPS Act - Section 8 (c) r/w. 20 (b) (ii) (C), 25, 29 (1) - The court discussed the provisions of the NDPS Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly focusing on the statutory bail entitlement when the final report is not filed within the statutory period. The court referenced the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M.RAVINDRAN Vs. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE (Crl.Appeal No.699 of 2020) to support its decision to grant statutory bail to the petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner/accused was arrested for illegal possession of ganja and sought statutory bail as the final report was not filed within the statutory period.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent Police had not filed the final report within the statutory period, entitling the petitioner to statutory bail.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to statutory bail due to the non-filing of the final report within the statutory period.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the fact that the final report was not filed within the statutory period, in line with the principle established in M.RAVINDRAN Vs. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE (Crl.Appeal No.699 of 2020).
Final Decision: The Criminal Revision Case was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and statutory bail was granted to the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 401 r/w. 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the order, dated 24/2/2023, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1134 of 2023 on the file of the learned Principal Special Court EC & NDPS Act, Chennai and set aside the same and directing the Principal Special Court EC & NDPS Act, Chennai to grant statutory bail.)
1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed to set aside the order, dated 24/2/2023, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1134 of 2023, by the learned Principal Special Court EC & NDPS Act, Chennai and direct the Principal Special Court EC & NDPS Act, Chennai to grant statutory bail.
2. Brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this case are as follows:-
The petitioner/accused was arrested along with two others for having illegal possession of 21 kgs of ganja and was remanded to judicial custody on 24/8/2022 for the alleged offence punishable, under Section 8 (c) r/w. 20 (b) (ii) (C), 25 and 29 (1) of the NDPS Act and under Section 328 of the Indian Penal Code. The contraband was seized by the respondent Police and the same was produced before this Court in A.No.154 of 2023.
3. On 20/2/2023, a petition has been filed by the petitioner, under Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking mandatory bail, on the ground that the respondent Police has not completed the investigation and charge sheet was also not filed within the statutory period. Prior to that on 13/2/2023, prosecution had filed a petition under Section 36 A (4) of the NDPS Act and the learned Principal Special Judge, EC & NDPS Court, Chennai has considered the application, whereas, dismissed the application filed to enlarge the petitioner on statutory bail.
4. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has come before this Court praying for the relief as stated therein.
5. Heard Mr.O.Chembulingam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prosecution had sought for extension of statutory period of investigation for the reason that they have arrested the accused 1 to 3 but not A.4 and the Principal Special Judge under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai, allowed the petition filed in Crl.M.P.No.984 of 2023, but dismissed the petition filed by A.1 in Crl.M.P.No.1134 of 2023.
7. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that they sought extension of time for further investigation only to collect some crucial documents.
8. I have perused the materials available on record.
9. On a perusal of the records, the fact reveals that the respondent police registered a case against this petitioner along with others in Crime No.209 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 8 (c) r/w. 20 (b) (ii) (C) 25 and 29 (1) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Admittedly, the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24/8/2022. Within a period of 180 days, the respondent Police ought to have filed the final report. Therefore, the petitioner/A1 filed a statutory bail petition and the same was dismissed by the trial Court on 24/2/2023, on the ground that the respondent police filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.984 of 2023 for extension of time for filing a final report is pending, which is unsustainable, in view of the principle laid down by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in M.RAVINDRAN Vs. THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE (Crl.Appeal No.699 of 2020).
10. The fact remains that the respondent Police has not filed final report, within the statutory period. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for statutory bail.
11. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the impugned order dated 24/2/2023, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1134 of 2023 by the learned Principal Special Judge under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai, is set aside and Statutory Bail is granted to the petitioner and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, o
The possession of a commercial quantity of contraband under the NDPS Act can invoke the bar under Section 37, impacting the entitlement to bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the accused's indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and the prosecutor's obligations in seeking extension of time under S....
The accused's right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. remains enforceable, and the court must promptly decide on bail applications to prevent the prosecution from circumventing this right.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the failure of the police to file a charge sheet within the stipulated time period, as required by the NDPS Act, can be a significant factor i....
The procedural safeguards play an important role in protecting the liberty guaranteed by Article 21, and failure to adhere to these safeguards can result in a violation of the accused's rights under ....
Statutory bail granted under BNSS Section 187(3) due to delayed final report in NDPS case despite near-complete investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.