R. SURESH KUMAR, K. KUMARESH BABU
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Chief Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai & – Appellant
Versus
S. Ramasamy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Pattern to set aside the order dated 15.11.2021 passed in W.P.No.25027 of 2011 and allow the writ appeal.)
SURESH KUMAR .J
1. This intra-court appeal has been directed against the order passed by the Writ Court dated 15.11.2011 mad in W.P.No.25027 of 2011.
2. The respondent was the writ petitioner, who is a practising lawyer since 1972 and on 10.06.2006, he was appointed as Additional Advocate General -II of the State of Tamil Nadu and he was subsequently designated as a Senior Advocate and later on 25.09.2009, he was appointed as Additional Advocate General - I. In that capacity, he appeared in several cases for the State of Tamil Nadu before this Court as well as before the Madurai Bench of this Court between 2006 - 2011.
3. He had claimed his eligible fee per day/per case basis and thereafter, he resigned the post of Additional Advocate General - I after the assembly elections results were announced. Therefore, from the year 2006 to 13.05.2011, the respondent/writ petitioner submitted various bills for his appearance as Additional Advocate General - II and I in respect of various departments and according to the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.