SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2688

R. N. MANJULA
Venkatasubramanian Ravichandran – Appellant
Versus
A. Nithya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:M/s. Thenkodi Annam Nelson, Advocates. For the Respondent:M/s. Rohini Ravikumar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 12 of the Guardian and Wards Act, praying to grant interim custody of the applicant''s daughter, Varsha Venkat, aged about 12 years and his son, Raghav Venkat aged about 2 years who are now under the custody of the respondent by directing the respondent to hand over custody to his children to him.)

1. Application No.3076 of 2023 has been filed by the applicant / petitioner, who is the father of the minor child seeking permission to grant interim custody of the minor children Varsha Venkat aged 12 years and Raghav Venkat aged 2 years. He has filed the Original Petition seeking permanent custody and guardianship of the children.

2. Heard the learned counsels for the applicant and the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

Application in brief:-

3. The applicant / petitioner is the father of the children and the respondent is their mother; the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent is a love cum arranged marriage and at the time of marriage, the couples were living at U.S.A.; a female child namely Varsha Venkat and another child Raghav Venkat were born to the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top