SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 1984

N. SATHISH KUMAR
R. Chandrasekar – Appellant
Versus
P. T. Sambandam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:R.J. Karthick, Advocate. For the Respondent:M. Mohamed Riyaz for A. Robinson, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(Q) of the Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in O.S.No.238 of 2020, dated 30.3.2021, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Tiruchirappalli.)

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order passed by the Trial Court under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code, attaching the immovable property.

2. The brief back-ground leading to the filing of the appeal is as follows:

The appellant was a tenant under the respondent herein. As he committed wilful default, proceedings have been initiated against him in R.C.O.P.No.117 of 2015. In the meanwhile, the respondent had also filed an application for fixing the fair rent in R.C.O.P.No.126 of 2015 and the learned Rent Controller has fixed the fair rent at Rs.29,700/-p.m. As the arrears are accumulated and the matter has reached its finality, for recovery of the arrears amount of Rs.16,07,900/- with interest at the rate of 12% pa. The suit has been filed in O.S.No.238 of 2020 for recovery of money. It is to be noted that the suit has been filed on 12.10.2020. At the time of filing the suit, an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top