S. VAIDYANATHAN, J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation – Appellant
Versus
Colorplus Fashions Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 11.05.2022, passed in W.P.No.18104 of 2012, whereby the order passed by the second respondent Appellate Tribunal was confirmed.
2. The issue in this case revolves around as to whether ''attendance bonus'' should come within the purview of ''basic wages'' in terms of Section 2 (b) (ii) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, in short, ''the Act''.
3. For the sake of convenience, the expression of ''basic wages'' under Section 2 (b) of the Act is extracted below :
(i) the cash value of any food concession ;
(ii) any dearness allowance (that is to say, all cash payments by whatever name called paid to an employee on account of a rise in the cost of living), house-rent allowance, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other similar allowance payable to the employee in respect of his employmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.