Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Namudha – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Nungambakkam, Chennai – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, challenging the Assessment Order ITBA/AST/S/147/2022- 23/1051280393(1) dated 24.03.2023 passed by the second respondent for the Assessment Year 2018 – 2019 within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.)
1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the fourth respondent to dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the assessment order dated 24.03.2023 in respect of the assessment year 2018 - 2019 within a reasonable time. An interim stay of collection of the disputed tax demand of Rs.19,41,080/- is also prayed for.
2. The petitioner asserts that she is an Income Tax assessee and that she purchased an immovable property in the interior part of Guindy Industrial Estate under a sale deed dated 10.11.2023, which was regi
The right of an assessee to request valuation of an asset by the Departmental Valuation Officer and the entitlement to an interim stay of coercive action pending disposal of a statutory appeal.
Writ petitions are not maintainable when an effective alternative remedy exists, emphasizing the principle of self-imposed limitations on High Court's jurisdiction.
The High Court will not entertain a writ petition if an effective alternative remedy exists, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention.
The court emphasizes the necessity of providing an opportunity for the appellant to present their case, upholding principles of natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article