SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 3039

C. KUMARAPPAN
Bagampriyal (Died) – Appellant
Versus
C. Suseela – Respondent


For the Appellants :S. Madhavan for Karthikeyavenkatachalapathy, Advocates. For the Respondent:P. Rajagopalan for R. Devaraj, Advocates.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.6 of 2016, dated 23.12.2016, on the file of the District Court, Sivagangai, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.77 of 2007, dated 01.02.2016, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sivagangai.)

1. The appellants 1 & 2 herein are the respondents/ defendants and the respondent herein is the appellant / plaintiff before the trial Court. The appellants 3 & 4 are the legal heirs of the deceased appellants 1 & 2.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.

3. The brief averments of the plaint is as follows:-

The suit schedule property was originally purchased by the plaintiff's father-in-law – Chellam Nadar, vide sale deed, dated 17.02.2003 from one Senthil. Ever since the date of sale deed, he has been in actual phys

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top