US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
G. K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
Dr. S. Ramadoss – Appellant
Versus
Murasoli Trust, Rep. by its Trustee, R. S. Bharathi, Chennai – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the entire records in C.C.No.1280 of 2020 on the file of the learned XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai District and quash the same.)
1. This petition has been filed to quash the compliant lodged by the respondent in C.C.No.1280 of 2020 on the file of the learned XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai District, thereby taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 499 & 500 of IPC, as against the petitioner.
2. The respondent filed private complaint for the offences punishable under Sections 499 & 500 of IPC. The crux of the allegations in the complaint is that the respondent owns, prints and publishes the daily newspaper Murasoli. The petitioner is the founder of a political party and he manages a twitter handle under the name and style of Dr.S.Ramadoss with URL http://twitter.com/drramadoss (hereinafter after called as “official twitter account”). The petitioner twitted from his offici
The twits made by the petitioner did not constitute the offence of defamation under Sections 499 & 500 of IPC.
The judgment established the importance of proving mensrea and actus reus in defamation cases, the requirement for authorization from the aggrieved person, and the high threshold for placing restrict....
(1) Defamation – ”BJP” is a determinate and identifiable body and complaint for defamation under Section 500 IPC is maintainable.
(2) Defamation – Right of a person against whom offence of defamat....
The court established that for a defamation claim under IPC Sections 499 and 500, the publication must lower the reputation of the complainant, and the truth of the statements must be proven in their....
Retweeting allegedly defamatory content constitutes 'publication' under Section 499 IPC, attracting liability unless clarified with a disclaimer or within exceptions.
Statements made without evidence that harm a public official's reputation can constitute defamation under IPC, justifying criminal proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the word 'person' as employed in defamation laws includes entities such as registered political parties, and the reputation of political parti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article