V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Kanniyappa Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Krishnaveni – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge's Court at Madurantakam, dated 30-10-2012 in A.S.No.8 of 2012 reversing the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court at Madurantakam, dated 28-10-2011 in O.S.No.89 of 2009.
The present appeal arises out of the judgment and decree of the Court of the Subordinate Judge Madurantakam in A.S.No.8 of 2012, dated 30.10.2012 in reversing the judgment and decree of the Court of the District Munsif, Madurantakam in O.S.No.89 of 2009 dated 28.10.2011.
2. The parties will be referred to as per their rank in the suit.
3. The defendants' appeal is before me.
4. O.S.No.89 of 2009 is a suit for permanent injunction based on possession. One Krishnaveni is the plaintiff. It is her case that her father Narayana Naidu purchased the property orally from one Desappa Naidu in the year 1968. Narayana Naidu had taken possession pursuant to the oral sale and was in enjoyment of the property from the year 1968 onwards. During the UDR proceedings, noting that Narayana Naidu was in possession of the property, patta was gr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.