Back
P. VELMURUGAN, K. K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Prakash – Appellant
Versus
P. Anbalagan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P. VELMURUGAN, J.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD) No. 15621 of 2017, dated 6.2.2028.
1. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
A Writ Appeal can be dismissed if the appellant indicates through counsel that it is not being pursued.
Writ appeals can be dismissed as infructuous when the underlying cause of action has ceased to exist.
A legal cause lapses upon the death of a party, resulting in the closure of related proceedings.
A writ appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution if the appellant fails to appear and show interest in pursuing the case.
A recorded compromise between disputing parties can effectively resolve the matter, eliminating the need for further judicial intervention.
Active participation in legal proceedings is essential, and failure to appear can lead to dismissal of appeals.
A legal action becomes infructuous when the underlying cause for the action ceases to exist, warranting dismissal of the appeal.
A compromise agreement between parties can conclusively resolve a dispute, negating the necessity for further court intervention.
The amendment to the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987 can nullify existing disputes, leading to the dismissal of related legal proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
