BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. SOUNTHAR, J.
Subbiah – Appellant
Versus
Anisa Beevi – Respondent
S.A. (MD) No. 1138 of 2009
Decided On : 25-07-2024
WITHDRAWAL - SECOND APPEAL - The court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S. No. 35 of 2006, which confirmed the earlier judgment in O.S. No. 133 of 2000.
Finding of the Court:
The court acknowledged the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal and granted leave for the same, resulting in the dismissal of the Second Appeal.
Issues: Whether the appellant could withdraw the Second Appeal and what implications this has on the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the procedural allowance for withdrawal of appeals under the Civil Procedure Code, affirming the appellant's right to withdraw.
Result: The Second Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs imposed.
JUDGMENT :
S. SOUNTHAR, J.
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S. No. 35 of 2006 dated 11.12.2007, on the file of Sub-Court, Paramakudi confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S. No. 133 of 2000, dated 17.3.2006, on the file of District Munsif Court, Paramakudi.
1. The learned counsel for the appellant circulated a letter, dated 22.07.2024 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the Second Appeal. Leave is granted.
2. Hence the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
A party may withdraw a Second Appeal, leading to its dismissal if the counsel formally indicates the intention not to pursue the case.
A party may withdraw a Second Appeal if the underlying dispute has been resolved through settlement.
A Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code abates against deceased respondents, and if already dismissed against others, the appeal cannot be maintained.
The dismissal of an appeal for default underscores the necessity of representation and active participation in legal proceedings.
The dismissal of appeals for default underscores the obligation of parties to appear and participate in legal proceedings, as failure to do so can result in the loss of their claims.
The dismissal of an appeal for default underscores the necessity of active participation and adherence to procedural rules in civil proceedings.
The dismissal of a legal appeal due to abatement highlights the necessity for parties to ensure proper legal representation in the event of expiration.
The dismissal of an appeal for default underscores the necessity for parties to be present and represented in court proceedings to avoid adverse outcomes.
The dismissal of a Second Appeal for default underscores the critical importance of a party's representation in legal proceedings and adherence to procedural norms.
The dismissal of a Second Appeal for default underscores the requirement for parties to attend court proceedings and the consequences of failing to do so.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.