SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ANITA SUMANTH, J.
R.Jaianuram – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
WP.No.35650 of 2023 & WMP.Nos.35616 of 2023 & 11472 of 2024
Decided on : 30-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant : Ms.Gopika Nambiar for Mr.V.P.Chamuraj
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Tamilvanan Additional Government Pleader (P)

IMPORTANT POINT
Temporary absences for education do not affect the claim for nativity; intention to return is crucial in determining residency.

Headnote:

Nativity - Residence Certificate - Article 226 - The court interpreted the criteria for nativity by birth and continuous residence, emphasizing the importance of intention to return and the relevance of temporary absences for education or employment in determining residency status.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, born in Puducherry, sought a Nativity Certificate after his application was rejected, claiming his family has longstanding ties to Puducherry despite temporary residence in Tamil Nadu for employment.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner established his nativity in Puducherry through various documents and his intention to maintain ties with the region, despite temporary absences for education.

Issues: Whether the petitioner qualifies for a Nativity Certificate based on his birth in Puducherry and his family's historical ties to the region, despite temporary residence elsewhere.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that temporary absences for education do not negate residency status, and the petitioner’s continuous education in Puducherry supports his claim for nativity.

Result: The Writ Petition is allowed, directing the issuance of the Nativity Certificate to the petitioner.

ORDER :

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Ceriorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent in connection with the proceedings No.6067/DC (R)N/A2/CV/2022/2797 Dt, 20.10.2023 confirming the Order of the 3rd respondents in his proceedings No.1425/TOP/Certification/2023, Dated 25-07.2023, and quash the same as illegal and direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to issue the Residence/Nativity Certificate in favour of the petitioner as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

The petitioner was born on 01.05.2005 at Jipmer Hospital, Puducherry. He claims that his father is a native of Puducherry and that his family has been living for seven generations in Puducherry in the same family house. According to him, his father had moved temporarily to Chennai and later to Kolappakkam in Kanchipuram District, all in the pursuit of better employment prospects. He had studied from the 1st to 12th standards in Societe Progressiste High School, Pondicherry. He now aspires for a medical seat and hopes to secure the same in Puducherry.

2. All statutory documents, such as Voter ID, Aadhar and Ration cards, according to the petitioner, reveal the residence of the petitioner and his family in Puducherry only. His application for issuance of Nativity Certificate had however come to be rejected by the Tahsildar, Puducherry/R3 on 25.07.2023 and an appeal challenging the same had also come to be been dismissed on 20.10.2023 by the Deputy Collector (Revenue) North, Puducherry. The authorities have concluded that the family is permanently residing at Kolapakkam, Kundarathur and the petitioner vehemently denies this.

3. He points out that R3 has issued an OBC caste certificate and a community certificate based on the categorization of the caste as per the list applicable to Puducherry. He places on record a letter from Larsen and Toubro (L&T) to the effect that the petitioner’s father is a permanent resident of Puducherry at No.11, Muthumariamman Koil Street, Pondicherry – 605 001, which address is what is reflected in his Aadhar and Pan cards.

4. The petitioner submits that his father is regularly remitting property tax for the property in Puducherry and maintains bank accounts in a Nationalised Bank at the same place. They have no connection whatsoever to Tamil Nadu except for the employment of his father there and hence he is aggrieved by the rejection of his request for Nativity in Puducherry.

5. The petitioner relies on the decisions in i) K.V.MohammedShabaar V. The Government of Pondicherry and others, W.P.No.10905 of 2012 dated 29.06.2012 and ii) N.Karunya Vignesh V. Union Territory of Puducherry and others, 2021 SCC Online Mad 15734. He also relies on an order passed by the Revenue Department of the Government of Puducherry bearing No.6260/C2/Rev/2003 dated 06.10.2003, which sets out guidelines for determination of residence in the Union Territory of Puducherry.

6. Clause 2 (i) in that order states that, while computing the period of actual residence in Puducherry, temporary absence for education, jobs etc. shall be ignored. Thus, according to the petitioner, his absence from Puducherry was temporary as it was only for the purpose of education and must not count in deciding the question of his nativity.

7. The respondents have filed a detailed counter objecting to the Writ Petition. They rely on a field enquiry conducted by R3 at Kolappakkam, Chennai, which revealed that the petitioner’s father owns a residential house at Kolappakkam, purchased in 2019.

8. Thus, according to them, the statement of the petitioner to the effect that his father does not own immovable property outside Puducherry is incorrect and must be construed as being fatal to the matter. This submission cannot be accepted as ownership of property in a place is hardly conclusive as to the nativity or otherwise of the owner in that location. Purchase of property may be for several

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top