Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
R. Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
K. Raj Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the common order dated 09.11.2020 passed in W.P.No.9668 of 2019.
Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the common order dated 09.11.2020 passed in W.P.No.73 of 2020.
Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the common order dated 09.11.2020 passed in W.P.No.23248 of 2019.
Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the common order dated 09.11.2020 passed in W.P.No.23254 of 2019.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the common order dated 09.11.2020 passed in W.P.No.23258 of 2019.
The common order passed in batch of writ petitions on 09.11.2020 is under challenge in the present writ appeals.
2. The complex factual situation arose with reference to the claim of the parties before us. One set of parties are quarrying operators and other set are the residents in that locality. The quarrying operators would submit that they have valid license to quarry. Equally, residents would submit that they have got building plan permission from the appropriate Authority and r
Point of law: Undisputed evidence to show that as per revenue records the existence of buildings and house sites, whereas in the case on hand, no revenue records have been produced to show that there....
The court confirmed that local authorities must ensure compliance with safety regulations when issuing permissions for quarrying operations, and can revoke them upon public complaints about safety vi....
Prohibited distances for building approvals near quarry sites must be observed as per statutory regulations and confirmed by court precedents.
The classification of land and the applicable rules for quarry lease applications were central to the court's decision.
The court mandated strict compliance with environmental regulations and established that quarry operations must not resume without verifying adherence to all safety and ecological safeguards.
The court emphasized the importance of proper consideration, adherence to principles of natural justice, and compliance with Section 77 of the Mines Act, 1952 in matters related to quarry leases and ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
