SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 1644

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN, JJ.
S. Sathya Saravanan - Petitioner
Versus
Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, Represented by its Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No. 23889 of 2023
Decided On : 27-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. A. Sundaravadhanan.
For the Respondents: Mr. M.R. Jothimanian, Mr. V. Anandhamurthy.

IMPORTANT POINT
A writ petition under Article 226 can be rendered unnecessary if the action being challenged has been withdrawn or dropped by the authority.

Headnote:

CERTIORARI - WRIT PETITION - The court addressed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash a resolution by the Bar Council. The court found that the action on the complaint had been dropped, granting the petitioner the liberty to pursue other legal remedies, leading to the disposal of the writ petition without costs.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 to challenge Resolution No.811 of 2022 issued by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted that the Bar Council had dropped further action on the complaint filed by the petitioner as of 01.12.2022.

Issues: Whether the resolution by the Bar Council should be quashed given that further action on the complaint had been dropped.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that since the Bar Council had ceased further action on the complaint, the petitioner was free to pursue other legal remedies, making the writ petition unnecessary.

Result: The writ petition was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to seek remedies as per the law, with no costs awarded.

ORDER :

S.M. Subramaniam, J.

[PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in Resolution No.811 of 2022 dated 01.12.2022 and quash the same.]

Mr. M.R. Jothimanian, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent/Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry would submit that further action on the compliant filed by the petitioner had been dropped on 01.12.2022.

2. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is granted liberty to workout his remedy in the manner known to law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top