Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
M. Kavitha – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging detention of the individual based on legal grounds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. ground for quashing based on non-application of mind. (Para 3) |
| 3. importance of substantiated reasoning in detention orders. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. legal precedent establishes criteria for detention orders. (Para 6) |
| 5. final result of quashing the detention order. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT :
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
1. The petitioner herein, who is the detenu, Anand @ Jillu, son of Manimaran, aged about 34 years, presently detained at the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated 26.02.2025 issued against her son, branding him as "Drug Offender" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
3. Though several grounds have been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner,
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
