BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. SRIMATHY, J.
A. Kathirvel – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Department, Chennai – Respondent
W.P. (MD) Nos. 8873, 8874 of 2026, W.P. (MD) Nos. 7158, 7162 of 2026
Decided On : 02-06-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. historical factual background of employment, continuous service, and regularization attempts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents' arguments regarding employment legality, absence of employment exchange referral, and application of uma devi precedent. (Para 4) |
| 3. court establishes distinctions between illegal and irregular appointments for regularization purposes. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. applying judicial precedents and circulars to mandate regularization for irregular appointees meeting eligibility criteria. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final order setting aside impugned rejections and directing service regularization without retrospective monetary arrears. (Para 11) |
ORDER :
1. Both the writ petitioners are similarly placed persons and are seeking similar prayer, hence both the writ petitions are taken together and passed a common order.
2......
(i) The Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.8873 of 2026 has been filed for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order dated 05.01.2026 passed in Letter (Ms) No.6/MP2-1/2026 by the 1st respondent and direct to regularize the service of the petitioner on par with the regularization of the similarly placed persons in G.O.(D) No.145, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (MP II), department dated 03.03.2025 and G.O.(2D) No.138, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (MP.II) Department, dated 28.09.2007 and to grant all consequential monetary and retirement benefits to the petitioner.
(ii) The Writ Petition in W.P.(MD)No.8874 of 2026 has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order dated 05.01.2026 passed in Letter (Ms) No.7/MP2-1/2026 by the 1st Respondent and to direct the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner on par with the regularization of the similarly placed persons in G.O.(D) No.145, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (MP II), department dated 03.03.2025 and G.O.(2D) No.138, Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (MP.II) Department, dated 28.09.2007 and to grant all consequential monetary and retirement benefits to the petitioner.
3......
(i) The case of the writ petitioner A.Kathirvel, the petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.8873/2026 is that he belongs to Kallar Backward Community and had completed his schooling in May 1980, then B.Com. through correspondence in Madurai Kamaraj University in July 1988. He was appointed as Casual Employee in Thanjavur District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. (TDCMPU Ltd.) on 25.08.1988. Thereafter he had passed the Diploma in Cooperative Management (D.Com.,) in March 1998. He had discharged his duties to the utmost satisfaction of his superiors and have rendered about 34 years of dedicated service without any blemish. He was retired from service on attaining superannuation on 31.07.2022.
(ii) The case of the writ petitioner, Mr.A.William Charles, the petitioner in W.P(MD) No.8874/2026 belonged to the backward community and he had failed in his 10th standard. He was appointed as Casual Employee in Thanjavur District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. (TDCMPU Ltd.) on 25.11.1992, and has rendered about 28 years of dedicated service without any blemish. He was retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.04.2020.
(iii) The other facts are that considering the age, qualification, vacancy position and on completion of 480 days in continuous two calendar years as required under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status) Act, 1981 and the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, the then Managing Director, TDCMPU Ltd., has regularized the petitioners' service with effect from 02.01.1996, based on the decision of Personnel Committee, dated 09.10.1995, but the regularization was subject to the approval of the 2nd respondent viz., the Commissioner, Milk Production and Diary Development. Thereafter, the petitioners were given the time scale of pay and other attendant benefits, like encashment of Earned L
State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi
Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Chennai Vs. R. Govindasamy & others
A. Umarani Vs. Registrar, Cooperative Societies and others
R. Radhakrishnan Vs. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies
Regularization of illegal appointments and entitlement to monetary benefits must be determined in accordance with the statutory provisions, relevant case laws, and government orders. Part-time employ....
Discriminatory treatment in employment violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, necessitating equal consideration for regularization and pension benefits for similarly situated employees.
Long-serving casual workers entitled to regularization with age/qualification relaxation when similarly situated peers regularized and posts available, upholding Art.14 equality.
The court does not have the power to direct regularization and/or absorption in service unless the recruitment itself was made regularly and in terms of the constitutional scheme. The petitioner fail....
Regularization of daily-wage or casual employees is not an automatic right upon completing 240 days of service. It remains contingent upon the availability of sanctioned posts and adherence to govern....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.