S.ACHARYA
Khirod Chandra Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Banshidhar Khatua – Respondent
Judgement
JUDGMENT :- Defendant No. 1 in Title Suit No. 264/14 of 1967/72 has preferred this appeal against the decision of the Court below in title Appeal No. 36/73 confirming that of the trial court.
2. The plaintiffs case, in short, is that in the family partition between Gouranga and his two brothers, the suit lands described in schedules A and B of the plaint fell to the share of Gouranga. Gouranga died on 25-9-66 leaving behind him his widow Dalimba, who was defendant No. 2 in the suit. Gouranga had alienated 29 decimal of land, described in schedule A of the plaint, in favour of plaintiffs 1 and 2 by two registered sale deeds dated 11-8-62 and 22-7-68. He also had sold the rest Ac. 4.11 decimals of land as per the registered sale deed dated 31-7-63 in favour of Latika, defendant No. 3, the wife of defendant No. 4. Defendant No. 3 thereafter alienated Ac. 8.50 decimals 6 Biswas of land, described in shedule B of the plaint, in favour of plaintiffs 3 to 10 by different registered sale deeds and these plaintiffs accordingly acquired valid title to the said properties. Defendant No. 1 (appellant herein) was not the adopted son of Gouranga and he had absolutely no right, title or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.