S.ACHARYA
Sailendra Kishore Patnaik – Appellant
Versus
Harekrushna Satpathy – Respondent
Judgement
JUDGMENT :- The unsuccessful plaintiff in both the courts below has preferred this appeal.
2. The plaintiff s case in short is that he purchased the suit land by oral sale on 25-10-54, from Laxmi Bewa, the original owner thereof, for Rs. 95/- and took delivery of possession of the same. Thereafter he continued in peaceful possession of the property and got the same mutated in his name. After the death of Laxmi Bewa on 2-2-55, the plaintiff obtained permission from the municipality for constructing a house on the suit land. The plaintiff remained absent from Baripada for a long time and in 1962 he came to learn that defendant no. 1 was trying to construct a house forcibly on the suit site. So the plaintiff initiated a proceeding u/s 145 Cr. P. C. which ultimately was decided in favour of defendant no. 1. Hence this suit.
3. Defendant no. 1 s case is that he orally purchased the suit land from Laxmi Dei for Rs. 60/- on 30-5-41 and got delivery of possession of the same. Laxmi died in the year 1943. Defendant no. 1 thereafter built a house on that land in November, 1950 after obtaining the necessary permission from the Municipality. The plaintiff s case of purchase of the suit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.