SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 835

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, I.MAHANTY
Manoj Kumar Panda – Appellant
Versus
Orissa Air Products Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.K. Ganguly, C.J.

1. This writ appeal has been filed by the workman, the Opposite Party No. 2in the Writ Petition which was filed by M/s. Orissa Air Products Ltd., the Company.

2. The Writ Petition, being OJC No. 8193 of 2001, was filed by the Company challenging the Order Dated 25.4.2001 passed by the Labour Court, Bhubaneswar in Industrial Dispute Misc. Case No. 5 of 1994. The said Misc. Case was registered on the basis of an application filed by the present Appellant under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( hereinafter called the ’said Act’). In the said Misc. Case, a prayer was made by the present Appellant for issuing a direction on the Management of the Company for computation of full wages during the period of suspension of the Appellant from service.

3. The material facts are:

The present Appellant was working as an Assistant Depot Superintendent in the Respondent’s establishment at Rourkela. In view of certain allegation against him, he was placed under suspension with effect from 4.3.1993. The said order of suspension runs as follows:

We have received reports alleging serious complaints about gross misconduct, as well as indiscipline of various natu





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top