SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 850

A.K.PARICHHA
Dibakar Behera – Appellant
Versus
Padmabati Behera – Respondent


Advocates appeared
M/s. G. Rath and Associates, for Appellants; M/s. P. K. Rath and Associates and Addl. Standing Counsel, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This is a defendants' appeal against the judgment and decree of learned District Judge, Koraput in MAT Appeal No. 1 of 2004 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Koraput in O. S. No. 19 of 2002.

2. The present respondents, as plaintiffs, filed the above noted suit asking for maintenance of Rs. 5,000/- from the present appellant No. 1 on the ground that they are the wife and daughter of appellant No. 1 and that appellant No. 1 neglected to maintain them and treated them with cruelty. Defendant No. 1 in his written statement denied any relationship with the plaintiffs and further pleaded that the present appellant No. 2 is his legally married wife whom he married in the year 1977. He thus denied his liability to pay maintenance to the plaintiff-respondents. Learned trial Court framed six issues, accepted evidence from the parties and on consideration of the same held that the plaintiff No. 1 is not the legally married wife of defendant No. 1 and therefore, she is not entitled to maintenance. The Court further held that the plaintiff No. 2 is the illegitimate child of defendant No. 1 and awarded maintenance of Rs. 2,000/- pe










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top