SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ori) 221

A.K.PARICHHA
Bhikari Naik – Appellant
Versus
Baban Sahoo – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.S. Rao, for Appellant; G.C. Patnaik and Associates, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :-

This is a plaintiff's appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, Jagatsinghpur in T.A. No. 17 of 1982 confirming the judgment and decree of the Munsif, Jagatsinghpur in T.M.S. No. 44 of 1978.

2. Plaintiff's case in essence was that he is the owner of the suit land and he mortgaged it to the original defendant-Daitari Sahu on 25-7-1961 and delivered possession of the same. As per terms of the mortgage, defendant was to remain in possession of the suit land and enjoy the usufructs thereof, in lieu of interest and to re-deliver possession of the suit land to the plaintiff on payment of the principal loan amount of Rs. 100/-. The plaintiff pleaded that in the meantime amendment to Section 17 of the Orissa Money Lenders Act came into force in 1975 and in view of that amended provision, the mortgage was automatically discharged and the defendant was legally duty bound to re-deliver the suit land to the plaintiff, but the defendant neither delivered possession of the suit land nor returned the mortgage deed to him. So, he was constrained to file the suit for a direction to the defendant to re-deliver possession of the suit land to him. The defendant











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top