SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Ori) 22

RAY, PANIGRAHI
RAMANARAYAN DAS MADANLAL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.Mohanty, G.C.Das

RAY, C. J.

( 1 ) UNDER Section 66, Income-tax Act, this Court asked the appellate Tribunal to state a case which has since been done. The questions referred to us are :

" (1) Whether the order passed by the Appellate Commissioner, diamissing the assessee's appeal on the ground of its incompetence, according to the proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 30 of the Act, is one under Section 31 and as such appealable under S. 33 (1) of the act, and (2) Whether such an order passed before expiry of the time either as originally fixed or later extended by competent authority for payment of the tax IB good in law. "

( 2 ) OF the two questions, the second one strictly falls within the scope of the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in the event of our answer to question no.

(1) being in the affirmative. When the appeal goes back to the Appellate tribunal it will be for them to consider whether the order of extension, if any, granted by the income tax authorities was a valid order and would conduce to the assessee being considered for the purpose of the proviso to Section 80 as one who has not committed any default, or who has not been in arrears in respect of income-tax. We have not been





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top