SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Ori) 18

PANIGRAHI
NIMAI CHARAN KAMILA – Appellant
Versus
SHAM MOHAN NANDI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.DAS GUPTA, D.MOHANTY

PANIGRAHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 227, Constitution Act, praying for revising an order of the District Magistrate, Cuttack, in a case under the Orissa House Rent control Act. The facts are that the application of the landlord for exemption under Section 5 of the Act was dismissed for default of appearance on 22-1049. The landlord filed a petition on 28/10/49 praying for restoring his original application. The House Rent Controller did not fake up this petition for revival, but granted an exemption under Section 5, as prayed for by the landlord) ignoring the order of dismissal passed on 22/10/49. The petitioner, who is the tenant, filed an appeal before the District Magistrate against this order of the house Rent Controller, in H. R. C. Appeal No. 188 of 1949. That appeal was disposed of by the District Magistrate by his order dated 8/12/49 whereby he sham Mohan Nandi (16. 04. 1951 -ORIHC) Page 2 of 3 set aside the order of the House Rent Controller granting exemption under section 5. The District Magistrate, however, remanded the case for a re-hearing of the revival application and disposal according to law. When the case went back to the House Rent Controller,



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top