SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Ori) 12

JAGANNADHA DAS, PANIGRAHI
GOUR CHARAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
ATAL BEHARI RAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.CHATTERJI, S.C.PARIJA

JAGANNADHADAS, J.

( 1 ) THE deft. 2 is the applt. before us, the resps. being the pltf. and deft. l. During the pendency of these proceedings in the lower appellate Ct. the matter appears to have. been compromised between the pltf. and deft. 1 and. that is apparently the reason why the present second appeal is only by deft. 2. The appeal arises, under the following circumstances.

( 2 ) DEFTS. 1 and 2 were the proprietors of a residuary Touzi no. 2463/r of the cuttack Colleetorate. This residuary Touzi was put up for sale for arrears of revenue and purchased by the pltf. on. 11-9-44. The suit is by the said purchaser for recovery of Khas possession from the defts of certain lands of the extent of 1. 90 acres within the; Touzi which have been recorded in the current settlement khatain Ext. 3 as being in the Khas: possession of the father of defts. 1 and 2 Under Section 26 (2) Orissa Tenancy Act. The pltf'a. case is that as a result of his purchase in Ct. auction, he has obtained also the right to the khas possession of the suit lands. Admittedly, the suit lands constituted at one time a raiyati holding. They have been purchased by the defts'. father and have been since then in the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top