JAGANNADHA DAS, RAY, PANIGRAHI
DURGA DEI – Appellant
Versus
SADANANDA PRUSTY – Respondent
JAGANNADHADAS, J.
( 1 ) THE 1st defendant is the appellant in this second appeal. The appeal arises out of a suit filed under Order 21, Rule 63, of the Civil P. C. , which has been filed by the plaintiff-decree-holder against whom an adverse order was passed, on a claim filed by the 1st defendant. The suit was dismissed in the trial Court, but on appeal it was decreed against the 1st defendant and hence this appeal.
( 2 ) THE suit property comprises two lots, specified in the plaint covering an extent of. 010 acres which admittedly belonged to one Kinu Sahu. Defendant 1 is his daughter. D. 2 according to the plaintiff is the adopted son of Kinu Sahu and D. 3 is the son of D. 2. Kinu Sahu appears to have died sometime long prior to 1919. D. 2 borrowed a sum of Rs. 90/-from the plaintiff on a mortgage of certain property, other than the suit property, admittedly belonging to Kinu sahu. The mortgage is Ex. 1 dated 5-5-1919. The palintiff filed subsequently a suit on that mortgage, obtained a decree, brought the properties to sale and realised thereby a portion only of the amount due. For the balance of the amount, he applied for and obtained a personal decree on 23-4-38. During the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.