HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
Panigrahi And Narasimham, JJ.
STATE - Appellant
Versus
SANKAR CHARAN SAHU - Respondent
Criminal Misc 14 Of 1951
Decided On : JANUARY 24, 1952
CONTEMPT OF COURT - MAGISTRATE AND SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE - JURISDICTION - SECTION 144, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - OBSTRUCTION OF CIVIL COURT PROCESS - IMMUNITY FROM ARREST - SECTION 135, CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE - GOOD FAITH - SENTENCE.
Fact of the Case:
A Magistrate passed an order under Section 144, Criminal Procedure Code, restraining a Civil Court process-server from arresting a judgment-debtor, who claimed immunity from arrest under Section 135, Civil Procedure Code. The Sub-Inspector of Police, on the basis of the Magistrate's order, prevented the process-server from executing the warrant of arrest. The High Court initiated contempt proceedings against the Magistrate and the Sub-Inspector.
Finding of the Court:
The Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to pass the order under Section 144, Criminal Procedure Code, as he was not specially empowered by the Government or the District Magistrate. The order was also improper as it was passed without any apprehension of breach of peace and with the intention of conferring immunity on the judgment-debtor from arrest under Section 135, Civil Procedure Code. The Sub-Inspector of Police acted in bad faith by preventing the process-server from executing the warrant of arrest, even though he was aware that the Magistrate's order was illegal.
Issues: 1. Whether the Magistrate had jurisdiction to pass the order under Section 144, Criminal Procedure Code? 2. Whether the Magistrate's order was proper? 3. Whether the Sub-Inspector of Police acted in good faith in preventing the process-server from executing the warrant of arrest?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to pass the order under Section 144, Criminal Procedure Code, as he was not specially empowered by the Government or the District Magistrate. 2. The Magistrate's order was improper as it was passed without any apprehension of breach of peace and with the intention of conferring immunity on the judgment-debtor from arrest under Section 135, Civil Procedure Code. 3. The Sub-Inspector of Police acted in bad faith by preventing the process-server from executing the warrant of arrest, even though he was aware that the Magistrate's order was illegal.
Final Decision: The Magistrate and the Sub-Inspector of Police were found guilty of contempt of court and sentenced to pay fines. The High Court also directed the District Magistrate to take disciplinary action against the staff responsible for allowing the original record of the proceedings under Section 144, Criminal Procedure Code, to be taken out of the Criminal Court.
NARASIMHAM, J.
( 1 ) THESE proceedings relate to contempt of the Court of the Additional Munsiff of Cuttack alleged to have been committed by Shri S. S. Roy, a 1st Class magistrate, and by Sri Sankar Charan Sahu, a Sub-inspector of Police. Original criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 11 of 1951 was started on the basis of a report submitted to this Court by the Additional Munsiff of Cuttack Sri B. K. Das. Original Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 14 of 1951 was started on a petition filed before this Court by M. S. Rao, a Senior Advocate of this Court. Both the cases refer to the same incident and consequently they have been heard analogously and will be governed by the same order.
( 2 ) MR. M. S. Rao had obtained a decree in 1935 against one Hrudananda Sahu and the execution of that decree was pending in the Court of the Additional munsiff (Second Munsiff) of Cuttack in Execution Case No. 18/258 of 1948/46. In that execution case a warrant of arrest under Order 21, Rule 18, C. P. C. , was issued against the judgment-debtor Hrudananda Sahu on 14-10-1949, for the realisation of the balance of the decretal amount of Rs. 836/1/- and it was handed over to a process-server of the Munsif's Court named Brundaban mohanty for execution. There was perhaps considerable difficulty in arresting the judgment-debtor in execution of the warrant and the decree-holder Mr. M. S. Rao appears to have carefully watched the movements of the judgmentdebtor with a view to give timely intimation to the Civil Court process-server for effecting his arrest. That opportunity presented itself on the 15th April 1950, when the judgment-debtor Hrudananda Sahu appeared as an accused in the court of Mr. E. Pal. a 1st Class Magistrate of Cuttack, in Case No. 610, C- 1/144t/48. He was ordered to be released on bail at about 8 a. m. (morning sittings) by the Court; but presumably there was some delay in getting the bail bond duly executed. In the mean time, however, Mr. M. S. Rao noticed the presence of Hrudananda Sahu in the Criminal Court premises and after giving due intimation to the Civil Court process-server began to take necessary steps so as to facilitate Hrudananda Sahu's arrest after his departure from the criminal Court. Hrudananda Sahu also noticed Mr. M. S. Rao in the Criminal court premises and being apprehensive of his arrest filed a petition through his advocate Mr. A. Das under Section 144, Criminal P. C. , in the Court of Sri S. S. Ray, Magistrate 1st Class, for restraining the Civil Court process-server brundaban Mohanti from arresting him andclaiming immunity from arrest under Section 135, Civil P. C. The learned Magistrate heard Mr. A. Das in support of the petition and M. S. Rao against the petition. He then passed an order purporting to be under Section 144, Criminal P. C. , restraining the Civil court process-server Brindabana Mohanty from arresting Hrudananda Sahu till he reached his home. He further directed that the notice of the order under section 144, Criminal P. C. , should be served on Brudabana Mohanti under section 134, Criminal P. C. , (sic) at once. The Magistrate then left the place and when Hrudananda Sahu proceeded in his car to his home he was stopped on the road close to the Police Office at Cuttack. The Civil Court process-server brundabana Mohanti met him there, showed him, the warrant and demanded payment of the sum mentioned in the warrant failing which he was to remain under arrest. The judgment-debtor pleaded for half an hour's time. In the meantime, a crowd collected there and a telephonic message was sent from the office of the Deputy Superintendent of police to the Sub-inspector of Police of lalbag P. s. Sri Shankar Charan Sahu to come with a few constables to prevent breach of peace. Sri Shankar Charan Sahu at once went to the spot and found the judgment-debtor sitting in the car with the road blocked and the processserver brundabana Mohanty standing close-by with the warrant in his possession. Till then the order und
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.