NARASIMHAM
PROSECUTING INSPECTOR – Appellant
Versus
MINAKETAN MAHATO – Respondent
NARASIMHAM, J.
( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the Addl. District Magistrate, Keonjhar, against an order passed by a First Class Magistrate of Keonjhar in a commitment proceeding under section 302, Indian Penal Code, against the opposite party.
( 2 ) THE local Police, after usual investigation, submitted charge-sheet against the opposite party under section 302,. P. C. on 30-3-51. The Sub Divisional magistrate of Sadar, Keonjhar transferred the case to Mr. K. K. Bannerji, magistrate, First Class. That Magistrate, after 2 or 3 adjournments, took up the case on 21-5-51 for enquiry under Chapter XVIII of the Criminal Procedure code. But on that date, though 7 prosecution witnesses were present, the prosecuting Inspector filed a petition for adjournment saying that the investigation of the case had to be reopened and some other witnesses examined. He also prayed for permission to be accorded to the Investigating officer to make further investigation into the case. The Investigating Officer also filed a similar petition before that Magistrate. The learned Magistrate thought that the reopening of the investigation at such a belated stage would be prejudicial to the accused persons and, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.