SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Ori) 32

JAGANNADHA DAS, MOHAPATRA
BHARAT SABAIGRASS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF COMMERCIAL TAXES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, M.S.MOHANTY

MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 24, Sub-section (2), Clause (b) of the orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, asking us to direct the Commissioner, Northern division, Sambalpur, to state a case.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are a Limited Company, incorporated under the Indian companies Act. 1913, having their Head Office at Calcutta. The Firm carries on business in Bamboos and Sabaigrass and supplies the above articles to Orient paper Mills, Brajarajnagar, Titagar Paper Mills and other Bengal Paper Mills. The firm, inspite of carrying on business for a long time, did not take steps to get itself registered under Section 9 of Orissa Sales Tax Act. Thereupon, the Sales tax Officer issued notice under Section 12, clause (5) of the Act in response to grass Ltd. vs. The Collector of Commercial Taxes (29. 07. 1952 - ORIHC) Page 2 of 6 which the Firm denied liability to pay the tax on the ground that the sales had taken place outside the State of Orissa and, as such, no tax was payable in orissa. The Sales Tax Officer, Sambalpur, by his order dated 16-12-49, assessed the petitioners to pay a tax of Rs. 3215/10/ -.

( 3 ) THE Sales Tax Officer's order of assessment solely relied u




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top