SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Ori) 24

JAGANNADHA DAS
H. NAIK, OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, PURI BANK – Appellant
Versus
PANCHANON DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.JENA, R.N.SINHA, U.N.RATH

JAGANNADHADAS, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a suit filed by the Official Liquidator of the Puri Bank for recovery ,of an amount of Rs. 7988-5-0 from the defendant alleged to have been, due in respect of the current, mutual and open account No. 202 of the defendant in the Balasore branch of the Puri Bank. The defendant was admittedly a person having a current account with the said branch of the Puri Bank. In addition to having a current account, he made certain fixed deposit's and was allowed overdraft facilities for double the amount thereof, on the security of the said deposits. The two fixed deposits are evidenced by Exts. B and B-1 and are for Rs. 2000/- each. Ext. B is dated 17-10-1944, and Ext. B-l is dated 21-9-45. That they were pledged as security for the overdraft account is evidenced by Ext. C dated 23-10-45. These facts are not disputed. The amount now sued for is what is due in respect of the said overdraft account with interest without any adjustment of the fixed deposit's. The defendant does not dispute the correctness of the principal amount shown in the account as having been advanced to him, nor does he dispute that the claim is in time. His defence is twofold: (1) That th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top