SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Ori) 67

NARASIMHAM, MOHAPATRA
HATI PRATIHARI – Appellant
Versus
ALEKH MOHAPATRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.C.Das, H.MOHAPATRA, P.C.CHATTERJI

MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment dated 20-7-1949 of Sri S. K. Mohapatra, additional Subordinate Judge of Puri, confirming the decree dated 8-9-1948 of Sri n. K. Das, Munsif of Puri, arising out of a suit brought by the plaintiffs for specific performance of contract alleged to have been entered into between the plaintiffs and the original defendant 1 (Jagabandhu Mohapatra) as manager of the Hindu joint family consisting of himself, and his minor sons and nepnews (defendants 2 to 8 ). Jagabandhu and Dinabandhu were two brothers. Dinabandhu predeceased jagabandhu in a state of jointness leaving his widow Suryamani and his two minor sons (defendants 7 and 8 ). The original defendants 2 to 6 are the sons of jagabandhu who were minors at the first date of the contract, that is, 20-6-1942 but defendant 2 attained majority in the meantime and defendant 1 (Jagabandhu)died during the pendency of the suit. The plaintiffs' case is that the said jagabandhu executed an agreement in favour of the plaintiffs on 20-6-1942 on a plain paper and received a sum of Rs. 50/- as advance of the consideration for the sale of a homestead land with a house thereon, the area of the




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top