SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Ori) 56

NARASIMHAM, MOHANTY
STATE – Appellant
Versus
RADHAKANTA PATNAIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.S.Rao, P.V.B.RAO

MOHANTY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the Government under Section 417, Cr. P. C. , from the order of the Magistrate, 1st Class, acquitting Sri R. K. Patnaik of the charges under sections 409, 420 and 465, I. P. C.

( 2 ) THE accused Radhakanta Patnaik was the section officer, Manijanga, under the s. D. O. , P. W. D. , Jagatsingpur, in December 1950. On 17-12-1950, the then chief Engineer Mr. Shaw, Irrigation Department, Orissa, intimated to the S. D. O. , p. W. D. , Jagatsingpur, that he would tour on the canal embankment from Santra bundh to Paradwip from 24th to 27th December, 1950. He wanted the canal bund to be made motorable, vide Ext. 1. The S. D. O. (P. W. 1) directed the accused to

"keep the canal embankment from Anantapur to Paradip in motorable condition on 26th and 27th December", vide Ext. I-a. The order was communicated to the accused on 20-12-50, vide Ext. I-b. The evidence on the record is to the effect that the accused-section-officer personally came to S. D. O. 's office, where the order was communicated to him on the morning of 20-12-1950. The evidence of the S. D. O. (P. W. 1) shows firstly, that he instructed the accused to engage labourers departmentally on




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top